Patent decision

BL number
O/103/07
Concerning rights in
GB 2293333
Hearing Officer
Mr D J Barford
Decision date
13 April 2007
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Aqueous Filter Solutions Ltd v James Peter Hosford
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 sections 1,2,3,72
Keywords
Claim construction, Inventive step, Revocation, Sufficiency
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claimant applied for revocation on the grounds (a) that the invention does not involve an inventive step; and (b) that the specification does not disclose the invention clearly enough and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art.

The hearing officer found under grounds (a) that claims 1 to 5 and 17 do not involve an inventive step, but found against the claimant on grounds (b).

The defendant was given the opportunity to file amendments under section 75.

Full decision O/103/07 PDF document65Kb