This site uses cookies to help make it more useful and reliable. Our cookies page explains what they are, which ones we use, and how you can manage or remove them.

Individual Responses on Modernisation and Simplification of the Rules of Procedure for the Copyright Tribunal

Overview of responses

The consultation invited comments from interested parties on issues and specific questions. We received 24 detailed responses to the Proposed Draft Rules. Half were from collecting societies. The remainder were from licensees/music users, trade bodies, consumer groups and from an individual, representing a wide range of sectors. The deadline for responses was extended for two weeks until 17 July 2009 to allow as wide a response as possible.

Key themes of the responses were:

  • Support for the broad thrust of the Proposed Draft Rules;
  • Concerns about making applications too easy (encouraging frivolous or ill-founded applications) or too difficult (discouraging legitimate cases);
  • A desire for clarification and additional detail; and
  • Requests from collecting societies for a right to refer cases to the Tribunal. This was explicitly excluded from the scope of the consultation as it would require primary legislation and will not be dealt with further in this document.

Individual responses to consultation

  • Beachcroft LLP
  • British Copyright Council
  • British Recorded Music Industry
  • CBI
  • CCPR
  • Community Matters
  • Concert Promoters Association
  • Consumer Focus
  • DACS
  • Educational Recording Agency
  • Joint Information Systems Committee
  • National Union of Journalists
  • Newspaper Licensing Agency
  • Periodical Publishers Association
  • Phonographic Performance Ltd
  • PRS for Music
  • Radio Centre
  • Royal Yachting Association
  • Ryde Carnival Association
  • The Authors' Licensing and Collecting Society
  • The Copyright Licensing Agency
  • The Libraries and Archives Copyright Alliance
  • The Publishers Association
  • UK Music