Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/321/06
Decision date
9 November 2006
Hearing Officer
Mr O Morris
Mark
DRIVESMART
Classes
12, 35, 36, 37
Applicants
Drivesmart Limited
Opponents
Smart GmbH
Opposition
Sections 5(2)(b) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 5(2)(b): Opposition largely successful. Section 5(4)(a): Opposition largely successful.

Points Of Interest

  • Comparison of the marks SMART v DRIVESMART

Summary

The opposition was based on a number of ‘SMART’ marks registered in various classes but notably in respect of motor vehicles.

Having compared the respective goods/services and the marks the Hearing Officer found a likelihood of confusion.

In the result the application was refused in respect of all the services in Classes 36 & 37 and some of the goods/service in Classes 12 & 35.

The opposition having for the most part been successful the Hearing awarded costs to the opponent.

Full decision O/321/06 PDF document141Kb