Patent decision
- BL number
- O/259/22
- Concerning rights in
- GB1918881.2
- Hearing Officer
- Mr B Buchanan
- Decision date
- 25 March 2022
- Person(s) or Company(s) involved
- Hitachi, Ltd.
- Provisions discussed
- Patents Act 1977, section 1(2)(c)
- Keywords
- Excluded fields (refused)
- Related Decisions
- None
Summary
The claimed invention relates to identifying a medical institution having available resources to execute a predicted diagnosis and treatment flow for a specific patient. The invention consists of a flow prediction model which includes a patient classification prediction model generated by machine learning. Patient state information such as present symptoms are used to determine a patient classification. The patient classification is used to determine the predicted flow, and in conjunction with medical institution resource availability information, suitable institutions are identified and presented at a terminal. The Agents referred to EPC Guidelines for Examination and argued that automated medical diagnosis served a technical purpose. The Hearing Officer applied the four step Aerotel/Macrossan test to determine whether there was a technical contribution and considered the AT&T signposts as the Examiner had applied them. The contribution was found not to provide a method of diagnosis or to include machine learning. It did not provide the required technical effect and the claimed invention was found to relate solely to a program for a computer and a method for doing business as such, so the application did not meet the requirements of section 1(2)(c). The application was refused under section 18(3).
Full decision O/259/22
329Kb