Patent decision

BL number

O/377/16

Concerning rights in

EP2525508

Hearing Officer

Mrs S Eaves

Decision date

8 August 2016

Person(s) or Company(s) involved

China Academy of Telecommunications Technology

Provisions discussed

Patents Act 1977 Section 13(3) & Patent Rules 2007 rule 10(2)

Keywords

Inventorship

Related Decisions

None

Summary

An uncontested application was filed by the proprietor China Academy of Telecommunications Technology under section 13(3) of the Patents Act 1977 and rule 10(2) of the Patents Rules 2007. As a result, it was found that Gaishi La should not be mentioned as a joint inventor in the granted patent for the invention and Rakesh Tamrakar should be mentioned as a joint inventor in the granted patent for the invention. The decision serves as a certificate to this effect. The Comptroller also directed that an addendum slip be prepared to reflect this for the granted patent for the invention.

Full decision O/377/16 47Kb