Patent decision

BL number
O/274/16
Concerning rights in
EP(UK) 2514873
Hearing Officer
Mr J Elbro
Decision date
3 June 2016
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Caterpillar Inc. and Joseph Vogele AG
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 Section 72
Keywords
Costs, Revocation
Related Decisions
O/104/16

Summary

This was a costs decision following a revocation action. The defendant had submitted unconditional amendments when filing the counterstatement, and ultimately the hearing officer had upheld these amended claims.

The hearing officer awarded costs on the scale to the claimant for proceedings up to the filing of the counterstatement, and to the defendant thereafter. He declined to make an award of costs off the scale, despite the unacceptably late nature of the presentation of the claimants arguments, because in the event the lateness did not appear to have significantly have increased the defendants costs.

Full decision O/274/16 PDF document73Kb